Hesitation and Repair Strategies in EFL Students’ Academic Presentations: A Case Study

Authors

  • Muhammad Dzimar UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia
  • Rahma Aulia Usysyfa UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia
  • Fika Naila Izzati UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia
  • Faiz Abdillah UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia
  • Syafhika Rosilatu Zahra UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia
  • Vadia Fika Munida UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia
  • Dewi Puspitasari UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan - Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61672/jeqk6y71

Keywords:

Academic Presentation, EFL Students, Hesitation Phenomena, Repair Strategies

Abstract

Oral presentations in EFL classrooms require students to communicate ideas fluently while managing the cognitive demands of real-time speech production. However, many learners experience hesitation and frequently repair their utterances, particularly during academic presentations in intercultural communication contexts. This study investigates the use of hesitation and repair strategies in EFL students’ academic presentations in an Intercultural Communication course. Using a qualitative case study design, the study focused on two university students selected purposively due to their frequent use of hesitation during presentations. Data were collected through classroom observations and audio recordings and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings showed that students commonly used three hesitation types: filled pauses, repetitions, and silent pauses. Regarding repair strategies, self-repair was the most frequently employed, while pair-repair occurred less often. Based on Levelt’s speech production model, filled pauses and silent pauses reflected difficulties in idea generation and speech planning, whereas repetitions indicated problems in lexical retrieval and grammatical formulation. Self-repair demonstrated active speech monitoring, while pair-repair highlighted the supportive role of interaction. The study concludes that hesitation and repair strategies function as important cognitive and communicative mechanisms that help EFL learners manage real-time speech production during academic presentations. These findings provide practical insights for EFL teachers in designing presentation-based learning activities that support students’ speaking fluency, self-monitoring, and strategic communication skills, while also helping students develop greater awareness of hesitation and repair as natural aspects of spoken language production.

References

Ajani, K. M. (2021). They Who Hesitate: The Influencing Factors of Hesitation Phenomena in Students’ Speaking at IAIN Langsa. JADEs: Journal of Academia in English Educations, 2(2), 110–134. https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/jades/article/view/3724/1924

Belz, M. (2023). Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses.” Languages, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010057

Beshir, M., & Yigzaw, A. (2022). Students ’ self ‑ repair in EFL classroom interactions : implications for classroom dynamics. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00153-6

Boonsuk, Y., Ambele, E. A., & Buddharat, C. (2019). POSITION OF HESITATION MARKERS IN EVERYDAY, INFORMAL CONVERSATION IN ENGLISH. ABAC Journal, 39(3), 129–140.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Fox, J., Cruz, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.024

Franscy, & Ramli. (2022). Problems Encountered By Indonesian EFL Learners In Mastering Speaking Skills. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v14i1.1176

Gósy, M. (2023). Occurrences and Durations of Filled Pauses in Relation to Words and Silent Pauses in Spontaneous Speech. Languages, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010079

Karina, S., Harmilawati, & Indirwan. (2023). THE HESITATION OF STUDENTS IN SPEAKING ENGLISH AT THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OFAHMAD DAHLANSINJAI. Journal of Literate, 4(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v1i2

Kharismawan, P. (2017). THE TYPES AND THE FUNCTIONS OF THE FILLERS USED IN BARACK OBAMA’S SPEECHES. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 1(11), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010112

Laila, M., Haryanti, D., Haryanto, S., Tedjani, M. F., Allami, H., & Rahmatika, L. (2023). The use of repair strategies in the EFL university classroom during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, Algeria, and Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(4), 1083–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1404.27

Lestari, R. I. H., & Nugraha, S. I. (2023). EFL Students’ Challenges and Strategies In Speaking English. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 2142–2153. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/3707

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MA: MIT Press.

Mokhtari, F. (2023). Enhancing Speaking Proficiency for “Master Science” Students: Challenges and Strategies. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 2(152–60), 52–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2023.2.1.8

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145

Noor, S., Khalid, T., & Abid, A. (2025). Conversational Dynamics in Public Discourse : A Conversation Analysis of Selected Podcast. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 3(3), 4719–4742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71281/jals.v3i3.432

Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., Mohit, F., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2022). Exploring Advanced EFL Learners’ Awareness of Communication Strategies. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v5n2.686

Ramadhani, M. R., Marwa, M., Mabarak, M. H. A., Zulianti, I., & Putri, Y. (2025). Repair Strategies In Student Interactions During English Speaking Activities. Pedagogical Research Journal, 3(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/Pedagogical/article/view/27754

Susilowati, E., & Kusumaningtyas, E. D. (2025). Unpacking communication strategies in casual conversation : An exploration of Indonesian EFL learners. English Education and Literature Journal (E-Jou), 5(01), 129–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i01.1515

Yonata, F., & Saptani, D. A. (2019). Communication Strategies: What Indonesian EFL Learners Do in Casual Conversation? IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 306–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1045

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

Hesitation and Repair Strategies in EFL Students’ Academic Presentations: A Case Study. (2026). EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 10(2), 914-928. https://doi.org/10.61672/jeqk6y71