Stylistic Realization of Illocutionary Acts in Deadpool & Wolverine: A Pragma-Stylistics Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61672/jmnj3d65Keywords:
Pragma-stylistics, Illocutionary Acts , Deadpool & WolverineAbstract
Language not only communicates information but also carries out social actions. Nevertheless, speech act theory has largely overlooked the role of stylistic decisions in influencing illocutionary purposes. The current research explores the stylistic expression of illocutionary acts in the action-comedy movie Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) focuses on sarcasm, hyperbole, and irony as essential linguistic tools. Utilizing Searle’s (1975) classification of illocutionary acts alongside Leech and Short’s (2007) pragma-stylistics framework, a total of 328 utterances were identified to include illocutionary acts, and 14 utterances were chosen deliberately for comprehensive pragma-stylistic examination. The analysis was conducted in three phases: illocutionary categorization, stylistic recognition, and pragma-stylistics analysis. The findings indicate that all five types of illocutionary acts, representatives, directives, commissives, expressives, and declaratives are expressed through stylistic devices that enhance, weaken, or reshape their communicative roles. Wolverine's dialogue is stylistically understated and straightforward in its propositions, while Deadpool's speech is stylistically intricate characterized by sarcasm, exaggeration, and irony. These findings indicate that stylistic form cannot be separated from illocutionary function. The study enhances pragma-stylistics by showing that action-comedy movies provide a vibrant setting for investigating how film dialogue generates meaning through the interaction of speech acts and stylistic structure.
References
AL Anssari, R., & Hadi, H. (2021). A Pragmatic Study of Sarcasm in Selected TV Shows. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(7), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt
Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Ekoro, D., & Gunn, M. (2021). Speech Act Theory and Gricean Pragmatics: A Review. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 18(4), 130–143. www.universalacademicservices.
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hama, B. S. (2018). The Pragmatics of Conversation: Benefits of a Stylistics Approach to Drama. Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani, 13(4), 251–276.
Kabalmay, T., & Susanto, D. (2025). Speech Acts in Pragmatic Linguistics: A Conceptual Review and Its Applications. Lexeme: Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.48753
Kačmárová, A. (2015). Exploring film dialogue discourse. Discourse and Interaction, 7(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2014-1-67
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: a linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Routledge.
Marvel Studios. (2024). Movie Scripts Deadpool & Wolverine. https://genius.com/Movie-scripts-deadpool-and-wolverine-script-annotated
Mehreen, S., Rasul, S., Akhtar, Y., & Graduate, Mp. (2021). Pragma Stylistic Features as an Interpretative Tool: An Analysis of Dawn Newspaper Headlines. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(11), 461–476.
Mey, Jacob. (1994). Pragmatics: an introduction. Blackwell.
Musolff, A. (2021). Pre-publication version of: Andreas Musolff, 2021. “Hyperbole and emotionalisation: escalation of pragmatic effects of proverb and metaphor in the ‘Brexit’ debate.” Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(3), 628–644. https://doi.org//10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-628-644
Salman, I. A., & Nasser, N. K. (2025). Irony and sarcasm in political speech: A pragmatic perspective. International Journal of Research in English, 7(2), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.33545/26648717.2025.v7.i2e.468
Schubert, C. (2025). Suspenseful Indirectness in Gangster Film Dialogue: A Pragma-stylistic Study of Scorsese’s Mob Bosses. Language and Literature, 34(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470251341387
Searle, J. R. (1975). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Simpson. (2004). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge.
Thomas. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge.
Tsvetkova, E. (2022). Cases of Misunderstanding: Reasons Why Conversational Implicatures Might Fail. Balkan Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.5840/bjp202214110
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Widyawanti, A., Aisyah, S., & Prasetyo, Y. (2024). Illocutionary Speech Acts in The Short Movie “The Translator”: Pragmatic Study Ayun Lestari. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 5(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v5i1.541
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amelia Az-zahra Dalimunthe, Tesalonika L.A, Gifa Auzira Alivia, Rahmadsyah Rangkuti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














