The Users’ Comments on Tiktok Account of Ishowspeed: A Study Morphological Errors Analysis

Authors

  • Suparwoto Sapto Wahono UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java - Indonesia
  • Nadia Dwi Rahmawati UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java - Indonesia
  • Sulistiana Khofifah UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java - Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61672/eji.v10i1.3041

Keywords:

Morphology, Analysis error, Users’ Comment

Abstract

This study aims to analyse morphological errors found in the comment section of the TikTok account @iShowSpeed, focusing on inflectional, derivational, and compound morphology. Researchers used a qualitative descriptive approach. The data were collected through online observation on social media and document which were screenshot from social media.  The data were collected using purposive sampling from users written comments on Tiktok account @iShowSpeed. The results showed that the most frequent errors were related to grammatical realization, which encompasses both syntactic and morphological issues. The most common issues were verb phrase errors, such as missing auxiliary verbs or incorrect tense usage (e.g., "Amy better than you" instead of "Amy is better than you"). Additionally, derivational errors were also common, including incorrect word forms like "retirement" used instead of "retiring," or misused affixes such as "employee" employed as a verb. In contrast, compound morphology showed fewer errors, with correct examples like “livestreams” being commonly used. These findings indicate that users often prioritize speed and informality in digital communication, leading to frequent morphological inaccuracies. This research highlights the influence of social media on language use and provides insight into the need for better morphological awareness, especially for non-native English users engaging in online discourse. The findings are crucial for developing targeted interventions in language learning curricula and informing digital literacy programs on effective online communication skills.

References

Bayu, W. M., Irawan, B., & Huda, M. M. (2024). Morphological errors in teaching composition at Al-Qodiri Islamic Boarding School’s Arabic Language Center in Jember. Abjadia: International Journal of Education, 9(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v9i1.25269

Calubing, A. I. (2024). Analyzing morphological errors and contextual influence in senior high school students’ written works: A qualitative study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(10), 4716–4727. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i10-17

Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Fitriani, S., & Kurniawan, D. (2021). Morphological errors in EFL students' writing: A study on inflectional and derivational morphemes. Journal of English Language Studies, 6(2), 112–123.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Irawansyah. (2024). Investigating of morphological errors of the students’ translation work through Google Form: Indonesia to English. Journal of English Educational Study, 7(2), 225–232.

Irawansyah, et al. (2024). An analysis of college students’ morphological error in translating recount text from Indonesia to English using surface strategy taxonomy. Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication, 2(1), 89–102.

Kalsum, Munawir, Nur Asiza, & Humaeroah. (2021). Morphology (M. Yusuf, Ed.). IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press.

Niez, R. A., Cerera, J. P. N., Ardon, J. M., et al. (2025). Investigating inflectional morpheme errors in ESL learners’ writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(5), 1399–1409. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1505.04

Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T. K., Hutauruk, M. N., & Marbun, L. (2021). Error in students’ thesis writing: Syntactical and morphological error analysis. BIRCI-Journal: Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2818

Putri, B. K. B. P., Soraya, N., & Rosalinah, Y. (2025). Sociolinguistic perspective on digital communication: Understanding Gen Alpha language use in TikTok. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 44–48.

Sari, M. R., & Ramadhani, N. (2020). Language use and grammatical accuracy in social media communication. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 8(3), 233–242.

Stoffelsma, L., Mwinlaaru, I. N., & Spooren, W. (2025). Testing university students’ morphological awareness of English as a second-language. System, 130, 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103626

Sukarton, S., & Dewanti, R. (2025). Teacher’s morphological awareness and errors in teaching English. Lililacs Journal, 5(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.21009/lililacs.051.02

Ugoala, B. (2024). Generation Z’s lingos on TikTok: Analysis of emerging linguistic structures. Journal of Language and Communication, 11(2), 211–224.

Yanti, R. (2019). An analysis of morphological errors made by EFL learners in digital writing. ELT Journal, 10(1), 45–53.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-10

How to Cite

The Users’ Comments on Tiktok Account of Ishowspeed: A Study Morphological Errors Analysis. (2026). EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 10(1), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.61672/eji.v10i1.3041