Review Process

Peer Review Process

  1. The articles published in CEMARA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Multidisplin are reviewed by 2 peer review partners.
  2. Journal review applies a double blind review system.
  3. Plagiarism screening of manuscripts that enter the CEMARA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Multidisplin is carried out with editorial and reviewer services as well as by checking the Turnitin application.
  4. In conducting the review process, research partners consider matters regarding: novelty of the topic, objectivity, methods, scientific impacts/implications, conclusions and references. In the end, the bestari partner chose one of the final recommendations, namely:
  • Accept Submission. Receive articles without any revisions given
  • Revision Required. Provide revisions without having to do a re-review. After the author revises the manuscript, it immediately proceeds to the editing process.
  • Resubmit for Review. Provide revisions and after the author revises the manuscript, it is reviewed again.
  • Resubmit elsewhere. manuscripts rejected and suggested for submission to other journals.
  • Decline Submission. Reject writing because the quality does not meet the requirements.
  • See comments. revision is needed according to reviewer's suggestion (in the form of recommendation)

Acceptance of an article by the Editorial Board depends on the novelty of the research, clarity of description, significance of the article, correctness of content, degree of originality, degree of plagiarism and suitability for the purpose of the journal.